Obama's World for America (Letter: 2)

Obama’s World for America
The Obama Syndrome

Everyone is on a high with President Obama, because he is the thing that will bring America if not the world change. I think the world is more in love with him than America to be frank, and they should be, he is what they want. With Bush, who made some big mistakes, made some good decisions also? Only two days in office and from what I see Obama is clueless, if not directionless. We don’t need miracles, we need sound judgment.
In less than 48-hours here are the decisions he is making, and planning. The planning part is more conjecture at this moment, but from what has said and he didn’t say, this might be pretty close to the truth.
First, he is going to release the prisoners at the Cuban, prison (Guantanamo) United States military facility, the one they just built a $500-million dollar addition to. Furthermore, he doesn’t even know where he is going to put them, great planning, how about mainstream America? Where else? I hope not in my backyard though, perhaps his. The point being, you have terrorists there, and no one wants them here, these terrorists want rights, not responsibilities, but rights, perhaps the ones doing all the complaining, from Europe over to Mexico and down to South America and Asia, should take them in, house and feed them, send out the welcoming wagon (but on that subject they are silent like mice). There are no takers, just complainers. I understand, it makes America look bad, but perhaps we are a little hasty here, I mean, do we have to have them looking through our kitchen windows to make America look pretty to the rest of the world, this is dangerous, and when some American house wife gets stabbed to death by one of these fellows, then what?
The president needs to find a better solution, not one the World wants, but the American Citizen wants, and I say citizen, because the president of America works for us, not us for him; we sign his pay check.
Having said that let me address the abortion clause he is in the process of signing. There are not many Americans I know that want to pay for a strangers abortion counselling, or abortion per se, but Obama doesn’t see it that way, so he is going to force feed us, like a baby, that neither is here or there, he will make some people happy by doing that, just as many mad. But the problem is, as it has always been, he kept it a secret until now, you know what I am talking about, those little deletions, generalizations, and distortions, we used to call them little white lies, because you didn’t really lie, you just fibbed. How many more will pop up soon?
Let’s go on here. I seem to be full of beans today writing all this on his second day in office, but he’s been a busy president these last few days, so what can I say.
On top of the one-trillion dollars America is in debt for, he is going to put $825-billion dollars on that, trying to kick start a dead lion. It is better to be a live dog than a dead lion. That is about 16% of our annual GNP, this is not good. The Monopoly Game money will be worth more than our dollar soon, with that kind of forecasting of spending just brings the world into a fright. And let’s hope, China and Japan, and Europe don’t call in our debt, god help us all then, we’ll have to all move to Peru, their money is a much higher value than the dollar at this moment.
Next, he is implying to overhaul our immigration, this may be another thorn in America’s side. If he is thinking, and I think he is implying, about opening the floodgates for Mexico, and Asia, and the rest of the world, I’d send the Statue of Liberty back to France, it is too high a price to pay. The Statue of Liberty reads, and perhaps he should read the saying on it, and I shall paraphrase, it’s been a while since I been out there, “…for the despaired…” not for the unemployed. In any other country, and I have been in 60, you do not demand citizenship because your government is to lazy to find a job for you, they don’t want you there if you do not have money in the bank. We could learn from them.

Last but not least, now what do I expect in the near future? One thing I think is that the United Nations will want the United States to bend their knees a little more, I mean we give them $20-billion already, but they’d like to control more than our pocket books, and this president I think is willing to hand over more than the piggy bank, this will come soon. And let me add to that, the World Court, which we have in the past so solidly defied and not allowed our solders to be overmanned by, lest we be on trial day and night and the enemy would love that (as I predict the terrorist at the Cuban prison will soon). What I fear is what I think he’ll do next, He will, I predict, hand us over to the wolves there. I hope I am wrong.

Another worthwhile note is, I feel the new president is being a little careless with the North Koreans, lifting the so called regime from the bad guy list, or terrorist list, when just a month ago, they told South Korea they would blow them off the map. I spent 11-years in the military, I realize we have a president who hasn’t spent 11-days in it, and is making decisions that can be very costly for our alias in that area. He needs to stop and think his decisions: ask the question, “Who will my decisions hurt?” It’s a simple question, not just go ahead and give the benefit of the doubt a secret society will come and hug you with open arms, that is a fairy tail way of thinking.


Well, that is enough for letter two, I did write one the other day, it is somewhere on the Internet.

The New President: now What? 1-2009

The new president—think as you will—is directionless, even though he has convinced the world at large to the contrary; presumptive heir to the Kennedy years, and Lincoln, saga. He has engulfed all the classes, although, perhaps into what soon may be known as the wishful-dreamers table in some lonely cafe. He has as I said in other articles, saved his complexities for a later date, and one has already emerged, the turning back of tax money, few Americans want to spend out of their pockets, on someone else’s kids getting abortions. He didn’t proclaim he’d do this of course, he’d note dare to, he only whispered it behind solid walls, like when he eliminated his middle name, for the sake of the presidency. He got the Mexican vote, but I doubt he is going to do much for them.
They are comparing him with heroes that have long been proven heroes, he has not done a thing but generalizes, delete, and distort. You are not witnessing a sour mouth, I would have voted for Rice, or Hillary, which I didn’t care to do, and I didn’t like the other choice running for president he was worse then Hillary, so I didn’t vote at all, how can one, with such a selection: one cancer, the aids. God help us.
He is going to put 800,000 billion dollars on top of the already one trillion dollars of money owed out, we will have to cut a lot of trees down to print up all those dollars. We see already, the financial world is gripping for their life. You don’t heal a wound by putting salt on it.
Everybody gives the president 90-days to see how he is doing, and in those 90-days we normally see what damage he has caused or what good he has done, but of course this may be different for Obama, simple because he has voiced his opinions so loud, we expect miracles from him now, only the devil or God himself can give. But all presidents have done so, prior to becoming president that is how they made president. Few do what they say, and those that do, always get enemies somewhere along the line, in either way. I hope the best for him and America, they sure put on a good show for him anyhow, and that is worth something, and if that is all we get, we might be lucky.

Siluk Horror writer: Bram Stoaker Award (2009)

Siluk: Bram Stoker Award

Announcing the Horror Stories and books by
Dr. Dennis L. Siluk, Ed.D.

Under consideration for the Bram Stoker Award

For best short fiction collection, 2009

See his horror books: the Tiamat trilogy, series, plus several short story horror books, “Death on Demand” (to include the renowned story, “The Rape Angelina of Glastonbury, AD 119” read by many of his 150,000-monthly readers) (and: “The Seventy Born Son”); “Dracula’s Ghost,” has eight trying stories, and “The Tale of the Jumping Serpents of Bosnia, another Colleton of eldritch short fiction (to include the growing interest in “Night Ride to Huancayo” a horrific supernatural tale). Also, the psychological thriller, “The Mumbler,” and “Manticore, Day of the Beast” And his book on visions “The Last Trumpet…” and “Angelic Renegades…” he is the unknown crown horror writer of the decade. Also see “After Eve” [a book of historic adventure].

His books can be seen on Amazon.com; B&N.com; abe.com and all the other internet big and small book dealers.

For those interested in the readings of Mr. Siluk’s books, he invites you to email the following:


stokerjury@horror.org stokerjury@horror.org
admin@horror.org

See Reviews by Benjamin Szumskyj on Dennis L. Siluk (and visit his many websites http:// dennissiluk.tripod.com


BENJAMIN SZUMSKYJ is a qualified teacher (Bachelor of Arts in Education / Bachelor of Arts in Social Sciences, minor in English) at a private high school. He also has a diploma as a librarian technician/assistant and a graduate diploma in Christian Studies. Szumskyj also acted as convener on the horror panel of the 2005 Aurealis Awards. In addition to being a member of the Australian Horror Writers Association, he is also a member of the (American) Horror Writers Association. His blog can be found at SSWFT, which is updated irregularly.



"In the Pits of Hell, a Seed of Faith Grows" - a review of The Macabre Poems: and Other Selected Poems (Volume III) by Dennis L. Siluk for Calenture: a Journal of Studies in Speculative Verse (Volume 1 # 1: September 2005).


"Interview with Dennis L. Siluk," for Lost Sanctum #2 (Wild Cat Books, 2006).


“He Is What He Writes: The Weird Tales of Dennis L. Siluk" for Dissections: The Journal of Contemporary Horror #2

(http://www.simegen.com/writers/dissections/February%202008/dissections_page_06.html>, 2008).

Push and Pull: Russia vs the West (WWIII)

Push and Pull: Russia
And the West

Strange if not peculiar, everyone is on the bandwagon to punish Russia over the cliff for invading Georgia, which had cause to do so, now we find they used cluster bombs against their own kind, this is no-good news—history will report the truth after it is all said and done, it always does, and as I said before, we will be finding out more truths as time goes by, and the longer time goes by, the more guiltier Georgia is, and its trouble making president, that has brought the west to the onset of WWIII; everyone things Russia is kidding, when they say take our pick between hem and us. We are not playing any longer with a wild card in our packets, and Georgia is not worth the price everyone is paying, and if the folks of Georgia want to back up their president, let them do so, but now with American money, weapons or protection. I for own see no gain in it, only loss. And to be truthful, there is no moral victory here; it is a stain on us from the beginning. Why we are there I don’t know.

Anyhow, so everyone in the west wants to punish Russia (or perhaps it is just Georgia and the United States) and no one is talking about punishing China who invaded Tibet, killed a million or two Tibetans, and had the world go to their Olympics. What kind of massage is that to the world, to Russia, to China? Perhaps the European side of the world is more important. Perhaps, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, and all those other Asian countries could care less, Even South Korea says nothing. Perhaps China knows how to silence these countries, and therefore, shut America up. Whatever is the case, it is a double standard. They belong to the WTO, with the US’s blessings, and we talk about stopping Russia, over a country with a ruler like the they got in Zimbabwe.
China is less of a friend than Russia, and may even end up in due time, at war with Russia, or comrades in a way against the West, they do have a long boarder with Russia, and think alike in many ways.
We should realize, Russia does not think like the west, it never has, and we all know it, yet we all try to wipe the stripes off its back.
When I want to make a friend out of someone, I allow them to be who they are, and except them for who they are. And deal with it from that perspective. You can’t change people, or a people, you change yourself, to adjust, or get out of their town.
We were doing the best we could do, with a people half subdued, and that was pretty good. Now we are doing not so well, and soon doors once opened will be shut. There is another world out there besides America and Europe. South America once pro North American is leaning towards Asia and Russia and he Middle East. We will lose them soon also.

I’m sure there are many factors involved here, there always is, greed being number one, stability being in there someplace, and preventing the inevitable. Whatever the case is, we must feel better dealing with Russia, because we act braver with them than China, I mean, would America really go to war with China over Taiwan? I don’t think so, unless we are crazier than they.
We may find out in future time, America is hoping to get out of that commitment I bet. Soon China will own that part of Asia, and then what? I think Russia has pulled back as much as it intends to do, and push into such countries more willing to support them, and keep the money flowing, countries like Venezuela, and Cuba, and Iran. They can do more for Russia, than little Georgia, and China can use their oil, they need it bad.
The big loser, Europe.

Is America Guilty...in Georgia? (Putin says so.)

Is America Guilty…in Georgia?
Putin says so.


I see a lot of politicians, those close to President Bush anyhow, saying how ludicrous President Putin’s remarks were, that our President had something to do with Georgia having enough guts to go forward and bomb their regions, to be subservient (how else would he have such guts); and in the process, killing all those civilians, Bush is trying to overlook, and keep quiet.
I don’t agree with the Russian tactics, but I surely don’t agree with Georgia’s either, whom seem to be getting absolution for their deadly deeds. But what is also interesting is after seven years of not giving an interview Putin does. Why? Perhaps he is hurt. A tender word for a muscle man, who doesn’t smile much, who has changed a sleeping bear to a happy bear with a bowel of honey, since they got all that oil, and now a—yes hurt bear. This friendship he had with our President must seem, full of holes for him, it would for me. I mean, I would be asking: are we only friends when I bend over backwards, how about you. It has been kind of a one sided relationship.
He said once, or the president of Russia said it, they have enough land, they don’t need more. How true that statement can be. And they do want to be part of the human race; they paid a dear price for it, giving up some 14 to 17, regions, since the cold war ended. And what have they gotten for it? Not even a thank you. But that statement Putin made, blaming it on the United States, that statement so many politicians said was ludicrous, how close to the truth was it, and it was pretty close I think. Even with old enemies, like Russia, what they say has some truth, if not logic to them. I agree, they don’t think like us, but half the world doesn’t think like us, not just Russia. Not sure if that is all good or bad.
Could it be, President Bush said to Georgia, “If you want, go ahead and take back your two regions, but don’t quote me, we’ll back you up; I doubt the bear will get over temperamental, plus we got strategies for that!”
Now the question comes up: why would he say that, and this is all guessing—what they call fiction, perhaps in the future, it will be less fiction and more fact, and it will come out in future times more dramatically, but it never does at the happening moment (behind closed doors).
If I was to take a guess, it would be that someone wanted to impress Georgia, we like doing that a lot you know in North America. And by saying what we said, they did what they wanted to do, and the US and Georgia got a shock treatment in return. This of course would not have been tried during the Cold War, but we got braver. And when Georgia found out the US could do little but talk, they went into a panic. And the US Presidency went frantic, that our powerful name could not move an angry bear, just nudged him a bit. It didn’t look good. There goes our future base, a supporting country that sent 2000-troops to the Middle East for us. And now in return we send those $20-million dollars worth of tax paying goods, for nothing, as if we owed it to them, as if we did something wrong, and want repay them, so they don’t tell the world the truth: a kind of silent blackmail.
Sometimes we say things we regret, and we do regret our president did what they did, I do anyhow, and it has put the world on edge, he is careless. And everyone is blaming Russia, which is a mistake; there is more in this than meets the eye. We counted our Chickens before they hatched, as they say, and one didn’t hatch as planned. We have to learn how not to be so blatant.
We need to mend fences, and it is not by covering up our dirty deeds by having the EU and UN, find loopholes to punish a bear that has all the honey on the other side of the world. Perhaps we need a president, as does Georgia that is more responsible for his actions.

The Russian Doctrine ( Part Two: Iran and Nuclear Warfare)

The Russia Doctrine
(For the world)


Is Russia preparing for war with America, the United States? Yes and no. They are preparing for something, and if it is the United Sates so be it, and if it is Israel so be it, and if it is the breakaway countries of Eastern Europe, so be it—and if NATO gets involve, who knows. They had one doctrine in 2000, and modified that in 2007, the doctrine is military of course, and all the commanders know they must be ready, as they were in Georgia, we saw how ready they really are, and they are ready, speedy and without question, and they know how to take down a weak nation.
Russia sees itself being smothered, if not under enemy control, don’t laugh, it has been forced feed into their systems for almost a century. It is like the old saying goes: if you tell a person long enough you don’t like chicken soup, he’ll come to believe he doesn’t.
I don’t see Russia planning an attack the United States, or the other way around, this is a different war, more on the order of a boarder war, with East Europeans, if it sparks something worse, than it does, but perhaps the days of cooperation are at its end, or close to it.
When Russia marries Iran, or takes them into their arms, then we got more trouble, the nastiness becomes home spun, the hostility will begin if Iran demands Russian support over Israel, and Russia gives it.
The good thing we got out of Russia, if anything is support working against terrorism, the Islamic element of it. And thus, we see internal security a major issue with Russia, as we do in the United States, and Western Europe. All this and more is built into the new doctrine, along with the west being responsible to recognize the Russian area of influence. They kind of feel they are, or were doing Eastern Europe a favor by protecting it, and I suppose this sparked Georgia, thinking they still had that right. On the other hand, NATO, which is proxy for the U. S., does as it please, anyplace in the world, which Russia surely sees as a bone of contention.
We need to look at the fact, they lost the so called Cold War, another bone of contention, and when a dog is done one should not kick him, and they kind of feel they’ve been kicked, and a hurt dog is dangerous, so when they can bend their doctrine, they will, as they did in Georgia.
China and Russia are becoming closer, as is Cuba, Iran, and Venezuela, and North Korea, sounds like the good old days, all our enemies turn to Russia. All these folks need technology Russia has, what we may be seeing soon is that lack of cooperation I was talking about, going, going gone to those countries. This new doctrine is only ink on white; it can be, whitened out.


Part Two Iran and Nuclear Warfare


Part of the doctrine, or so called new policy is for Russia’s military (so the chief of staff has said), if threatened, or in case of a major threat, the use of nuclear weapons will be considered, and he wants the world to take this into consideration; that is to say, if Russia feels it needs to defend the sovereignty, territorial and integrity of Russia and its allies, not only military forces will be used, but Nuclear Weapons will be preventively used, meaning preemptive nuclear weapons strikes. I think this may be more slanted toward Israel over Iran, once the honeymoon starts with Iran and Russia.
Again I must say, Russia does not like NATO encircling her, it is to her an aggressive move. And now we want to put missiles in Poland, that is a defense system, which America says is because of Iran. The problem is more I think based on the fact Russia has a land and sea-launching sophisticated system in place where it can fire missiles from either point, onto Eastern Europe; thus, this would endanger its capability destruction. Whatever it is, it is too close for comfort for the Russians. That maybe crossing a red line, I don’t know.
Russia is at present delivering nuclear fuel to Iran, Israel sees this as a deadline to hit Iran before it does what it says it will do, hit Israel. So we see a lot of roads leading to Armageddon.
In the past, the United States and Russia have been pretty much level headed in their war games, and many a country has tried to provoke Russia to fight America, and the other way around. And as we all see, Russia played chess with Georgia, and won. And so far Russia and America are still playing. America had Russia in Check, and now she is out, and the game continues, until check-mate.


8-18-2008

Red Cross Foolishness

Red Cross Foolishness

First of all I was not going to write the article, but the Red Cross is kind of forcing it, and my wife is pushing me, Rosa. I mean, they got their say, now leave it alone, it is old business, and the Red Cross on the man’s sleeve may have saved the lives of fifteen people, in what is considered a war zone. You can’t get anything better than that.

The question comes up: Was the Red Cross emblem used with improper intent?
Perhaps it was, and I’m sure it is not the first time this has happened, but it looks like you got some professionals up there without much sympathy, in the high offices that can’t put it to rest. They say look at the future of the Red Cross! It damages the potentiality of helping others. The media and the Red Cross themselves are doing more damage than Colombia had ever intended to do, if indeed they had intent of using the emblem at all in the first place.
The President of Colombia, whose father was killed by these terrorists, and the man who wore the arm emblem by trying to make the point of their mission, an internationally mission and Red Cross supported, did what most folks would have done, had they been put into such a position. But now these so called good folks up in the high Red Cross offices, are calling it a war crime.
First of all I praise Colombia for such a daring feat, second, the terrorist got what they deserve, third, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe is my hero now; forth, is not the INRC, suppose to be helping the sick? These fifteen hostages they had were not the healthiest birds in Colombia, and these folks making the biggest noise, I bet ate a fat breakfast, and had their eight hours of glorious sleep, so they got to get off their high horses and look at what was achieved. Actually they need to look at it from a different perspective: had one of those hostages been their mother, father, child, husband, wife, would they be making such a big gripe over spilt milk? I don’t think so, and if they would, I’d not want them in my family circle.
From another vantage point, if that man who wore the emblem saved your son’s life, or family member’s life, or the mission’s life, what then? Is the Red Cross saying, he needed to take off that emblem, and say “Come and Kill us all now, because we are fooling you folks?”
I saw that happen, when the United Nations would not send in a helicopter to save their own team in Africa years ago, because it violated protocol, and I wonder now and then how their families think about it; when it would have been a simple task, because the helicopters were close by. They asked the US to do it, and the US said, if we did, you folks will insult us internationally, again for violating your standards, so the folks cried and screamed over the phone as they got slaughtered, cut to bits and pieces by the machetes of the black antagonists.
In conclusion, let me say this, right or wrong, every law has their exceptions to the policy, depending on the circumstances, we are not robots. If we limit ourselves to such standards, we become limited not only in war, but in saving lives. After the conflict, or after the war is won, no one asks, especially the losers, “Did you fight fare?” Winning means life or death, and remember we each only have one.

International Blackmailing

International Blackmailing

We kind of knew this from the 1970s through the 1980s, or at least we talked about it back then, that international blackmailing would become a reality, if we did not put it in check at that moment, and we did not put it in check, and still we have not. It now is a reality, like the EU is now a reality, in the 70s it was loose talk, the ten-nations now are something like 26, but my point is this. All the third world countries have to do is starve its people, and get a few nuclear devices, and blackmailing is next. Like North Korea does, and Iran does, and Pakistan did, kept their people dumb, keep them as followers, take over the country like Burma’s generals have, and Zimbabwe has, and all those other countries that get Care Packages, keep the money and buy nuclear capability, and tell the United Nations “Look at our poor people we can’t feed them,” and demand you get what you want, and usually you get it. If you don’t mention the big bomb, and you will surely get it, it’s just a matter of a process called international blackmailing. Now they can make a deal with the international community: pay us off, or else! So we send them free food, billions, and free oil, billions, and now the got the best of two worlds, and in essence didn’t lift a finger for a thing. They feed their armies now with this free deliver items, and send a few packages down the street to the poor: their priority is to build their arsenals, not feed peasants, like Palestine does, and the terrorists in the hills of Colombia, they could care less about feeding the hungry civilizing folk, so we send more and more food. It is all blackmail, and it works, so why change things. And this new century has all these human right groups, and the news media to start a fire if we don’t.
Point two, it all doesn’t stop there, we holler we do not want our tax money to go to these regimes in Africa that are using the money to feed their armies, and nuclear ambitions, as we have done in Asia, but the good guys from the United Nations, and the so called representatives of the world, the Human Rights groups, yell at America in particular, if not directly, through the UN, and say “How undesirable and wicked you are with those folks, they are dying by the hundreds, no thousands!” So how did this come about? That is a side they do not look at. It is simple; they are killing their own people with the food they do not have to buy, which they use for weapons. They take (as in Africa) the white man’s farms, give it to the black man, and he sits on it like a king, and does nothing, and after a while, it decapitates, like it has in Cuba, which I was there a few years back, and all those once lovely swimming pools, and mansions, are no better than shanties now. Good job Castro. So the money we give to the poor countries, they buy weapons with to kill their own kind, while the human rights groups run to the US, or EU, or UN, to save the day, so we can send more food or money to support the killing soldiers. I am not sure what side these groups are on, but I do know this, Satan is working overtime with planting stupid seeds in their heads.
We seem to say little about the blackmail aspect of these called third world countries, the poor boys down the black, and in most cases the reason they are poor is not because they have to be, but their government wants them to be, because they’d get their heads chopped off by the leaders, if they try jump over the poverty line, it is only allowed for a few to do that. If I was a king of one of these countries, I’d love the Human Rights groups to death, love them morning and night, even send them a free hotel pass, at any five star hotel in the country, if indeed they have one, they get their bread buttered by these folks.

I’ll put it in a nutshell; we are enabling other countries to embezzle, to take our tax monies and misappropriate those funds, to kill and starve and build up for World War Three. I can’t make it any plainer than that.

What is the solution? I’ll say it not so sweet, but up front, and you will not want to hear it, so don’t read this part then, but this part is the problem, and we are going to get rid of some of the problems right now: no one wants to hear reality, they want to live in a nutshell. Anyhow, let Israel bomb Iran, and that will take care of the nuclear issue one, therefore another ten-years, and they have enough oil to feed those starving masses if they want to. If not, well, let their president do what he does best, boast.
Second, North Korea, don’t give them a dime, let them take care of their own, if the people of North Korea want a dictatorship, let them have it, it’s called, create a revolution, like we did in America and fought for our freedom. In most cases, in governments, you get what you deserve, what you’ve supported. If the people are not willing to fight for it, then perhaps it is not worth fighting for, let the bad guys do what they’ve been doing, as long as it does not melt out into other societies. As far as the nukes go, blow them up. They are not going to hit South Korea, they may be strange, but they are not that stupid, they will lose the ‘goat and the rope.’
Zimbabwe, lets not have a stroke over it, half of Africa is like Zimbabwe. If they can afford to bring in ship loads of arms, they can buy their own bread. If they do not want to buy bread for the masses, then we got a choice, and it should not be blackmail. Go in and dethrone the king, or pay the piper for the rest of our lives, or his, or just let him do what he does best; chop heads until someone chops his off.
The world is getting full of these so called Humpty Dumpy’s who will fall sooner or later off their high towering walls. I for one do not wish to pay taxes to keep Egypt afloat, or Palestine armed, or to pacify the Human Right’s folks.

Indifference Under the Sun (Torregaveta, west of Naples, southern Italy)

I read today of the two girls in Italy on the beach who drowned, and the bystanders, or beach folk, whatever you call them, were quite indifferent on the matter, simply looked at the dead bodies, and went back to their sunbathing, sipping soft drinks, and so forth and on. The question I ask myself is this, “Why I am not surprised?”
About 18-months ago, I did an article on indifference in Buenos Aires, Argentina, basically what I said was this in a nutshell: my wife and I were walking down a street, three young men came and jumped on us, one large person grubbing me, around my arms and shoulders, and the other men grabbing my wife, to rob her peruse. I freed myself from the large man, broke his nose and perhaps ankle, with my heel, when I kicked it. Then went to my wife to protect her, and one of the two let go to fight me, and I started to subdue him, and the large guy came back, this time didn’t grab me, but rather pushed me, so his friend could run back and help the other fellow with my wife to get the purse, while I was off balance, I again, subdued the big guy, and tired to get to my wife, now two of these guys attacked trying to get her purse, and they saw me, and two of them attacked me again, pushed me to the ground, in the process one remained by me, the other two of those grabbed my wife’s purse and ran, with the third following, and I ran after the third, but my wife called, and I stopped. I was 59-years old, so I was getting winded, and she was worried I suppose.

Well enough of the fighting, I now was with my wife, we looked up the street, a woman was watching, 80-feet away. We walked up to her, I said, “Nice show, ha?” And she said, “We rode by and saw it all.” I asked, “Who is we?” And her response was, “My husband and I.” She was perhaps in her late 30s. Then I asked, “Where is your husband?” Well, she looked at me, then with a smile said, “Oh, he’s in the car, parked over there, didn’t want to see it.” She pointed a few feet away from where she was, to her car.

She then said to my wife, “I saw it all, everything,” and after a few minutes, the police came, and she repeated that to the police. And I got thinking, here she and her husband was, in the safety of their car, watching me and my wife battle it out, and all she could do is watch from 80-feet away, and her husband hide in his car around the corner. Why not stop the car in front of the bully’s and watch, get a better show, why 80-feet away, they really like being safe. Or why didn’t they simply go, since they were not going to do a thing anyhow.

Oh well, enough of that, most people I meet come under the coward area anyway, especially men nowadays, who when they feel safe, they got a big mouth, but little back up. So I get an email from someone in –you guessed it, Buenos Aires, he wasn’t sad by that attack, or even concerned how my wife was, he said in essence: how come you attack Buenos Aires (which has an obvious answer to), we are not as bad here as you say, and he went on and on how nice and safe it is there, and how great the people are. Not one bit sad for what happened to us, what a loser I thought, he perhaps needs a little experience in this area, he most likely would have cried like a baby, and not fought, most people don’t they only like a good show and world that doesn’t disrupt theirs: he will most likely get his due.

I did go to the police, and they said, “No sense in making a formal complaint, it happens all the time here.” If I would have shot the robbers, they, the police would have put me in jail for taking thier business away. They, the folkis in Bueonos Aires, and I all know they are in on it. I called up the American Embassy, and asked about getting a new Pass Port, and in the process he said, “Don’t take it so hard, even us guys here have all got robbed by someone, sometime here in Buenos Aires.” And to add to this, our guide had told us how nice and safe the city was, don’t worry wherever you walk in town here, its safe. It is the most unsafe city I have ever been in, and indifferent to its guests. And the indifference is like that beach in Torregaveta, west of Naples, southern Italy, where those poor girls, in their teens, died, and everyone just looked on, under the sun.

Howard Stern: You mean the sick one?

1. Howard Stern: yes, Again, the Sick one!
   
   Every so often I get an email, on Howard Stern, why I don’t care for his kind of entertainment. I get actually both kinds of emails, negative and positive. Negative saying, I should like him, and how great he is, and I should not write about him negatively, which I have not for years, and positive folks saying: your right he is a bad news, bad entertainment, a bad example for our society, especially our kids.
   Years ago when I was writing for a website, I wrote several articles on him, basically saying what everyone would expect a Christian to write.
   I said in essence, we have a lot of folks out there laughing at his sick and dirty jokes, and his TV sketches which where pats on the girls butt, and his homosexual overtones, and friends coming to his station to get on TV, and show all they could in a filthy way; So the question comes up again, why don’t I care for him or his entertainment. I’m a Christian, that should settle it and that should really settle it, but for some folks out there it doesn’t.
   His followers, which I hear are 10-million, so Howard claims, want me to embrace him. I think I could pray for him, but embrace him is a little too much. And if he really has 10-million followers, we can all see why there is an issue out there, we got a lot of folks liking what he stands for, and that is filth, and we all know that. He knows that, I know that, and you reading this know that. What you put into your mind, is what is going to come out of your mouth sooner or later.
   Nothing new: he does not talk on the virtues of life, or the sanctity of womanhood, or the love of children, or the need for Godly people, it is to the contrary, he talks about women being machines, and usable for sex and other pleasures, as men can be also. He has no virtues so he leaves them out of his talks, and just puts in jokes and puns, and children, I would guess are no better than dogs to him, except when he goes home and puts on the daddy play. He talks about alcoholism as if it is a nice escape, and he demonstrates his morbid issues, like William Burroughs did in his books and Allen Ginsberg has in his poetry. They all belong to the same sick club, and they infect our society, especially the children that end up listening to those around them, and hear that he is there idol, hero, and to be honest if that is the best anyone can come up with for a hero, we are really in deep mud: many folks think this person is a champion for the freedom of speech (which his folks would like to take from me, if they could, since I do not embrace him), when in essence he and they are the sick part of society. But freedom of speech, is not what he uses, he uses the weak side of man’s brain, he knows the psychological part of it well, and he feeds it, like one feeds a bull before the matador slaughters it. He knows he’s not going to Heaven, and doesn’t believe in hell, so he is free to infect society with this fitly virus, and he does.
   In conclusion, let me say, I do with people would stop bringing his name up to me, he offers nothing to mankind, nothing I really want to write about, only to the devil in man does he feed, and we have enough of that, what he offers, without his input. And so, to those who have written me using his name, I hope this once and for all puts it as a settlement, he will get his due in due time, and he is not worth anymore of my time, of course, you already know this, you just want to hear an echo of my displease with such folks. You can comb the internet and find out the other comments I’ve had on him years ago, that should feed your hunger. Now if this offends you, I can’t figure out why, Howard writes much worse than I. And don’t worry folks, your hero is still alive and among you, and the devil is waiting.

The False Leopard: Obama

The False Leopard: Obama

Obama, He will be the biggest mistake the United Status has ever made in selecting a president, if indeed he becomes president; if he becomes president, he will be the most Ungodly president we ever had, perhaps that is why the young folks like him. He is for abortion, for gun control, he translates the bible to mean what he wants it to mean. He is no Christian, and not only has his blood testified to that, his mouth has. He will be the down fall of the once American Empire. He tries to change his spots like a leopard, but he can’t. We had many good men to select for our president, and we ended up with the three worse of the lot, and Obama, among the three, is the least likely to be of any use to the American People. He will stop a war, and create a new one, one we cannot win. He will hand the government over to the United Nations, and the European Court, Dr. James Dobson, Christian Psychologist, is absolutely right, here is a man, a wolf in sheep’s clothing, one who feels Christianity does not belong in the Whitehouse, or even in Congress, or even in America, although he wants the Christian vote.
He has never been in the Military, and mocks the military by saying he can run it better than any man alive, that it doesn’t take a seasoned veteran to run such a program, he must think it is the Boy Scouts he’s talking about.
Here is a man that hides behind his middle Islamic name. Whose church is more anti white, bias and cantered toward spreading the good word that white folk are the enemy, even more so than the Black Panther’s did in the 60s. If he becomes president, God help us all. I think Obama thinks he can fool all the people all the time, if indeed he is given that time. But as the old saying goes, you can’t fool all the people all the time, perhaps some of the time, until they wake up. It would seem to me, Obama, would like all the Christians in America to overlook their belief systems, and vote on the least moral grounds possible, leaving ethical issues for the church, and democracy for him to decide how it should be for the people by the people. Yet the foundation of America was not built on his beliefs, they were built on a strong Christian foundation, one I believe he wants to eliminate, if he can. He implies we should not fight for what we believe, we should not fight at all, just let the government lead blindly the blind. He doesn’t want Christianity in the schools, but he wants the children in the schools to abide by Ten Commandments, everything he talks about is Godless, and superficial faith.

Political Dementia in Peru

Recently, Peru had a fiesta for the world at large, shut down Lima, gave everybody a holiday without pay, and lavished the rest of the world with gifts, telling them how great Peru is, even though there is a robber on ever street corner ready to kill for a few bucks. Every woman, every household, and perhaps everybody, in Peru have been robbed once or twice and it is rising with Garcia in power, the day he was ordained King of Peru; the police are worse than the robbers, they wait by churches and rob the security people who are trying to protect the houses around the neighborhood, that is really the job of the police, but they now have taken up robbery themselves, it pays better. Every house in Lima has gotten iron bars on it, and you got to ask why? It is because Garcia’s police force demands it to be so, lest you lose house and furniture. Nowadays, the robbers do not take a T.V., or computer, they take the whole house full of furniture; and Garcia says on TV, look how great we are. He is blind, and lead by the blind; he has dementia I think, or is in another world.
They, the president and his staff, now want to have the Olympics in 2020 AD, and they can’t even feed their own, they have to still take handouts. Something is missing here. Garcia is on another one of his grandeur episodes, he was in the 1980s, and Peru plunged to the depths of hell, like Zimbabwe has recently, and now that Peru is sending all its food out to other counties, to become international, Garcia likes that word, food prices have doubled in Peru, how nice of him to think of the international trade before his own people, that suffocates his own people. All he will be remembered for in history I fear will be as a pea in a pod, that none care to remember. He is so out of sink with his people. I think he is trying to do what he did last time, hide the money for retirement, and run to Paris when his regime is up, but this time he wants enough money to have it out live him. He moaned and groaned about how he wanted to show the people of Peru, he could be a good president, if only they would give him a second chance; but as most Peruvians can see once a thief, always a thief.

Can we afford Obama?

Do we dare with—Obama?


Obama is not the right person for President, period. Why? We judge a person by whom he hangs around with, what is said, and if he stays in the same house with the person he says is doing wrong, and we so judge this person accordingly. It took him a long time for him to make that decision, with a lot of apologies in between to leave his church domain. We judge everyday, ever decision we make. To be frank, none of the three candidates are fit for office, but I fear Obama, is the worse of the worse, Clinton, whom I do not favor either is the best of the worse. This of course is my opinion. But I have looked, as the nation has looked closely at his background, as we should, and what he says, and where he came from, and where he goes, and who he hangs around with, and found him needing. He regrets he has had a negative relationship with a church recently, that is recently, I wonder what that church has talked about for the last twenty years, it by their own tongue, anti white, anti everything but Muslim and black, so it seems, and under the roof of Christianity “Wherefore, if I come, I will remember his deeds which he doeth, prating against us with malicious words: and not content three with, neither doth he himself receive the brethren, and forbade them that would, and cast them out of the church.” (Epistle of John) they talk it, they salute it, and all in the name of Jesus Christ. They scorn Clinton, as if she should be hated, “But he that hate his brother is in darkness, and walks in darkness, and know not whither he goes, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.” (1 John). God gave to John a message he said, “…try the spirits see if they are of God: because false prophets are gone out into the world.” This is Obama’s church in a nutshell.
I hate to tell them, but Christ was not black, nor was he white, he was Jewish, and we know what a Jew looks like, do we not, and what comes out of the mouth comes from the heart, and so we know the heart of the church, and perhaps a good portion of the heart of Obama. On the other hand, he has a slight bend to the Muslim agenda. On one hand this is seen as a gift, for both sides of the world, on the other it is very suspicious—like taking his middle name out of his full name, and not exposing the fact his father is Muslim, they had to pry it out of him, because he wants to hide the fact for the present, until he makes president, he is of the Muslim code, or could be. Even Satan can go into a church and bend his knees with the rest of the crowd, and walk out smiling. It does not mean he is for Christ, his ways his heart. And one cannot afford to guess who is sitting in the White House.
He is pro gun control. If he could, and he may have the chance to, he’d take the guns away from everyone in America, everyone that is, but his bodyguards. Perhaps he will also join the International Court that will end the active role for our military around the world as a superior power, tie their hands. Also, he will give the United Nations all they want, at the expense of the American Tax payer, now we give twenty-billion of our money to feed the empire of the UN, while our own unfed, remain unfed. This would pull the rug from under the chair right out from the poor.
He has never served a day in the military, and I do not think is qualified, to control the military, why should we give him control of something he knows nothing about. It is like giving a backyard car mechanic, the go ahead to fix the 747 Jet at the international airport, whom will carry all the food, arms, money, and congress to its next destination. I spent eight years in active duty, one in war. And he wants to be Commander and Chief, where is his qualifications, in this area I would and could make better decisions, and I do not feel qualified. God help us all, if he is president.

China says: No Meddling (why?)"

China says: No Meddling!

China says for all the folks in the world, “No meddling,” they are at this juncture referring to Burma, and I say Burma, because the country is still legally Burma, but why would China say that? Although it has been their policy for ages, actually, not until right after WWII, is when they formed that police. It sounds like a good philosophy, but coming from China, and referring it the Burma makes a person stop and think. This morning I woke up and this of all things was on my mind. I thought it was like someone saying, leave the fly that is caught in the spiders web alone; no meddling, we’ll talk to the spider about it later.
Recently they, meaning China, was sending arms to Zimbabwe, and said the same thing, and I thought why are they not looking at the harm they may do at this particular time, I mean we have again the spider and the fly, and the flies are caught in a big spider web and being beaten for their resistance. Perhaps they are like one another, you know: one like one, or as they say: two peas in a pod.
I am getting a little analytical, in a philosophical way, and I should just say what is on my mind I suppose. Zimbabwe as we know it, is of course being run by a gang a thugs now (Like North Korea), by an illegal government at the moment, and its form of Democracy, is simply a cover up— hypocrisy. Nothing new, everyone knows this.
Burma, is run by a group of Generals, that were not elected to the government (a takeover after WWII); a gang, a group of thugs. Usually the longer you stay in power the world comes to the point of legitimizing you as the official government, in this case: half of the world has, the other half has not.
We see this in Cuba also, where the people fought for a cause, and got eaten by the spider in the process. As it was in Haiti, and in several African countries, besides Zimbabwe, happening at this very moment, and yes, as we see in China.
China is run by a group of thugs, who took over after WWII, and if they did not say what they do say nowadays “No meddling,” they have to listen to the world scorn them. They have become legitimized, even got the Vatican listening to their echoes. Matter-of-fact, they got the World brainwashed to believe Tibet is part of their legitimized government. They will say, Tibet was once part of China, and they are right, it was, five-hundred years ago, and they broke away: but that is like saying: Alaska is was part of Russia, fifty-years ago, and Russia now coming to claim her back, now! And Russia might have tried, if she could, like China is doing, because she can. So for them to say, “No Meddling,” is only to reinforce their illegal government, selected by a coup d'état.
China knows, as well as North Korea, Burma, Cuba and Zimbabwe keep the people fooled, degraded, poor, for it is easy to lead the unlearned the uninspired, the broken willed, to water and make them drink. With the wise, it is easy to bring them to the water, but hell to make them drink it. They also know, with isolation, you can fool the masses easier than trying to fool the well traveled. It is all a game, to these kinds of people, games with humanity. And they have what they say in Peru: no shame, or no blood in their faces. So you cannot really talk to them, you go to show—and it is no love they are looking for.

War: Bush’s Billions, and Billions and Billions!

For the war games the following year, spring to spring (2008-2009), it will cost American taxpayers $178-billion dollars, making the total almost one Trillion-dollars for the two wars we got going on, since 2001, in the Middle East. There is something wrong here… $178-billion dollars, what can we do with that money back home? First we could pay off our debts; restore the dollar, help people with heat issues this coming winter, help them with gas issues this summer. Help feed the old, and restore Social Security to a ripe old system to what it used to be. So many things we can do, but we are throwing it away on a dead horse. The oil rich countries do not care about their brothers, why do we? Democracy is an over used ward over there, and used quite a lot by the rich here in America, trying to get their hands on those contracts (to rebuild a country we destroyed by our bombs, and now feel we got to bring air conditioners and everything under the sun to appease them for our victories), these contracts, go through Washington D.C., from all over the world—hand picked by our elected—they can smell the money from the UN to the EU, to and through China, all wanted a share of the bottomless war bank. Yes, in war time, the rich get richer, it is a Republican play, and at the end, everyone gets a share of the goodies, except the taxpaying poor and middle class, and the soldiers doing the dying for what? –Democracy? Come on now, we all know better, tell that to the dying. How about our national security? I doubt it has a once of truth to that anymore. With that kind of money going out, we can build a better security system for Americans back home. Whoever passes these out of whack bills, I hope you remember them, on Election Day. No wonder nobody wants our money, it’s becoming no better than toilet paper, even Peru they are avoiding using it for business transactions nowadays, although you can still buy a hamburger or so with it.

Hillary Clinton: Iran Don't Dare! And Big win in Penn...

Hillary Clinton: Iran Don’t Dare! And big win in Penn…


I really have not been too confused on whom to vote for; this is my third article on the subject. I like to own guns, and I was in the military for eight years, and three years in the reserves, making it eleven years. And I never have liked the selection we had for our next president, but Hillary did something today I was very proud of, something President Bush didn’t have the guts to do, or any other president that I can remember except Eisenhower, and that was to tell Iran: we can, and we will obliterate you, should you try to do so to Israel. Perhaps a lot of folks do not like that kind of talk, but I like a persons cards on the table. Let them know what you are up against. If I was Hillary I’d say the same thing to North Korea, let them know the deadly force behind the soft spoken American voices. They know we can if we want, but somehow they forget we will, if we have to. North Korea has threatened the South with obliteration, as Iran has with Israel. It is only fair to let them know: have you forgotten these are our allies? What has happened to our man-guts, say what you mean, and mean what you say.

Hillary has won the election in Pennsylvania, and perhaps well deserved, she has come a long way, and was not a quitters, as I saw a few other candidates were, whom I wanted to vote for, and they let me down and ran like chickens to wherever, I’m glad they did, they don’t deserve my vote. I kind of liked Obama, until he got a little arrogant, and cocky, and wants to take the guns away; I really do not think Hillary will win the whole show, but she could surprise me. My prediction would be, Obama, will not win either in the long run, he wants to take the guns away, and is ashamed of his middle name, and that arrogant side of him, I can’t stand; and the more he talks the more I turn away from him and say: he’s a mistake, never has a solid answer. On the other hand, Hillary might bring the boys home from Iraq, everyone promises this and that and when it comes time to do it, they don’t, but I do believe Hillary does not want to spend another 100-billion on the war, so she is the best chance for that, as far as cheap gas goes, she might bring it around, but we will not have it for long, we are running out of it. Plus she is tougher than I thought. Even McCain, didn’t have enough guts to back down Iran—or let them know what we can, and will do.
So congratulations Hillary on you win and perhaps your nomination as Democratic candidate—to be. I have voted Republican the last two times, or is it three, I forgot, I think it is time for a Democrat.

Oil: A world Crisis Coming (soon)

Oil: a World Crisis

I don’t think anyone really wants to read this article, but I think they should, we got a growing world crisis on hand. I will not live to see it all the way through most likely, but the younger generation wills, those just under me by
Twenty years, and I’m 60-years old, the beginning of the crisis will start in 2010, yes soon. And by 2020, it will be a full fledged crisis, and by 2040, it will be black Sunday or close to it—empty. Let me explain the world oil crisis to the best of my knowledge, and I am not an oil expert, nor do you or me need to be, but I am learned in reading and writing, and can read the signs of the times, and graphs pretty well. So the data I am going to supple is pretty up to date stuff.

From the year 1997, we have perhaps (claimed anyway) 40-years of oil left underground in the world—depending on a few items, and looks like there will not be any conservation in the near future. The reason we got 40-years of oil, and not 30-years oil is because from 1980 to 1990 the world conserved oil, 50-billion barrels of oil. We did something right for once.
According to the Ph.D.’s in the oil business out there we have a 40,000-million-barrels (4 BBO/year x 10 years) (BBO =Billion Barrels of Oil)), that world oil production can and will use, beyond this, there is no more. From 1930 to 1997, we used 838-billion barrels of oil.
OPEC produces for the world about 10-billion barrels of oil a year, and they want to up that in the next few years. The world uses about 25-billion barrels a year. So you can see the future at this rate will hit a zenith of usage by 2010, over 30+ billion barrels a year. We must remember there is not an endless supply.
In 1979, the world used 64 MMBD (Million Barrels of Oil a Day), by 2010 it will be 85 MMBD. By 2020, if we do not conserve at 35 MMBD, we are going into a vortex of some kind of unthinkable crisis, we will have to conserve, be forced to, a barrel may be over 300+ by that time. I do not drive while in Lima, or Huancayo Peru: WHY? To conserve, plus it is cheaper to use a taxi or bus. Thus, I can buy more food.
What I am really saying is this: we are going to witness soon something beyond the world’s experience, and it is later than you think; government’s best plan on an oil supply crisis, not trying to figure out how to land on Mars. We got to figure out how to live the next generation out.

The question I somewhat answered previously, I will make clear again: when will worldwide oil demand exceed global oil supply, this question is overlook by everybody in the business, and its users, but I see a prediction date at 2010-2014.
I do not want to blame any country or anybody for the coming crises, these pointing fingers is not going to do any good, nor solve the problem. We all can come up with good reasons for sucking the earth dry of oil, but my suggestion is, let the big boys figure this out, and figure it out soon, so the well doesn’t go dry before you get to the gas station.
If we were to add future discoveries of oil, it would look insignificant, but we can look at it, perhaps two-billion barrows a year will be discovered, so the experts say, and this can be stretched out for 60-years, but it really doesn’t change much. At the rate we are going now, 85-billion barrels a year, it is two and half years of oil, and that is “if” we find new oil. And at this point, you will be able to buy the gas station building for a full tank of gas.

Zimbabwe: Democracy at its Worse

Zimbabwe: Democracy at its Worse

I don’t know what is going to happen over this election in Zimbabwe, the world knows Robert Mugabe lost the election; he now wants to have a recount in over 20-districks, this is democracy at its worse, matter-of-fact a mockery of democracy. Leaders and countries of leaders use the word loosely to get world support nowadays, when in essence it is a dictatorship, and the only thing Mugabe is doing, is going through the motions. The past results have yet to be released. I know all this is old news, but it just needs to be retold before I give my opinion, and of course that is exactly what it is, my way of thinking, and perhaps, a few others.
China is no friend to human rights either in Zimbabwe, and they better hope Mugabe wins because if he doesn’t, the new leader will remember the shipment of arms they are sending to kill more Zimbabwe’s (and China wants to look pretty to the world, what a way to do it).
Now for my opinion; the United Nations, and the EU and USA, they all like the word Democracy, and for ten-years, Zimbabwe has been parading that word around the world, around like they own it, proud of it. This is supposed to be the United State’s goal, or so it seems, for countries, to try on Democracy, a government by the people for the people; whom you elect, is what you get, and if you get what you don’t want, because it turns out bad, well, you made a bad choice, you got to live with it. Now I’m no Einstein, but I can figure out this one I think. If I did all I could to play the game right, and democracy turned out not to work, and you end up with the same guy you tried to get rid of, who uses the word Democracy, but does not go along with it—and uses deadly force to keep his grips onto his throne, and the world says “He’s a bad boy, now wait for five years, or ten more years and try a new democratic election,” what would you say?
I know what I’d say…stick it buddy where the sun don’t shine.
Why, because it doesn’t work, and no one came to our rescue, only gave us lip service. Thus, you now have created a rebel group, to fight the government, and now the illegal government, and other nations are going to call it a terrorist group in time, which it is no. It is kind of like trying to convert someone to Christianity, and when he sees how bad the Christians act, like the priests have recently in the Holy Church in Jerusalem—fist fighting over a prayer spot, you say to yourself: I think I’ll stay with my old religion, or try to find something else, but you do not join the sect that is fighting—you just lost respect for it, right or wrong, the actions of the priests speak loud and clear of their hearts.
So to the politicians of Democracy, if you do not get rid of the weeds in Zimbabwe, you may never have another chance for it to bud into a democracy again.

China vs. Cafferty

Now the Chinese are mad because someone has spoken up about their government, trying to silence CNN’s commentator, Cafferty, the only one to call a spade a spade. Like the Muslims, who fear freedom of speech, and demand the world look at them through unrealistic plastic eyes, now China does the same. Pretty soon, America will have to shut up, and say nothing about anything. Cafferty said in essence, we buy all their junk (Chinese trinkets he means), and we do (as they hold billions of our dollars and buy arms for the World War Three), and he adds, they are really a bunch of gangsters running the Government, and it is pretty much towards the truth, the only difference is, they have become legitimate over the past fifty years, but that is what they were when they started out—much like Saddam in Iraq, and Castro in Cuba. Much like most of South America, and Central America, and Cambodia, and—well I could go on and on; China wants us to look the other way when it comes to Taiwan, and Tibet, as does Venezuela, and Zimbabwe, and Iran and Syria. Should we? It is really something we all talk about anyhow, we just do not have the means to get on TV and make it public. I go from store to store, in Lima, Peru, or in St. Paul, Minnesota, and what do I see, exactly what Cafferty says he sees, junk we call it, but again it is little trinkets, China has flooded the market with such items, like Japan did fiftey-years ago.
The movie that has recently been the talk of the decade, about Muslims, really only shows what they’ve done, why in heavens name is it so bad to watch; it was all shown on TV long ago, it simple is a wakeup call on what they did, and could do again, and are doing at this very moment—I have Muslim and Jewish friends, and Christian friends so what, and I have black friends, so what, and I have Chinese friends, so what. And all my friends talk about fixing America, not China, or the Middle East, or Israel; they talk about America—again so what.
My advice to China and the Muslim world, clean up you act up, if you want a clean bill of health. I never saw such silliness in my life, where a country cries over remarks that are almost right on the center. China and many of the Middle Eastern countries have their populations brainwashed—we all know this, this is no new revelation, they only tell what they want them to know, and when they find out the truth, which the nation is trying to hide, then the Governments get made at the Western media for exposing their devilish deeds: so must we hide our heads like in a hole like an ant eater to appease them? This is a new world order, and it will get harder and harder to hid such devilish acts unless you become a part of North Korea, where all you can do is look across the dividing line to the South and wish, and go back to your hidden society.
Incidentally, when I was in China, I bought the Chinese English paper, and they cut down America and its people scornfully—publicly. And I doubt they have stopped, so China clean your house out first, before you start pointing fingers.

Obama, He’s starting to sound—lacking!

The more I hear of Obama lately, the less I like him. What comes out of the mouth comes from the heart. Now he down grades small town folks. In addition, He also believes no one should have a gun but the robbers, and those protecting him. What next? I don’t care for any of the candidates to be frank, and so I got to pick the best out of the worse, and so far the best plan to get out of Iraq, is Hillary, and she I do not think will dare try to take our guns away—Obama believes the second amendment is his, and only his to own, that is called vanity. McCain will drain the country dry and leave our Americans in Iraq until they blow a gasket inside their heads, like Bush has. So we have Cancer, Aids and Ulcers to choose from, not a good selection. I hate all this “I’m sorry,” business if I offended this or that party or group— “…Forgive me!” It sounds like we got a bunch of backyard uneducated kids running for office; say what you mean, and mean what you say, or don’t say anything, you look better that way. Obama is even ashamed of his middle name because it is Arab. If the Teamsters have any dignity, they will not help Obama, if so they will be robbing from their votes, their Union that is—in the future. When Obama gave his speech on how he was going to deal with Iraq, I think he was the only one that could figure his own humdrum speech out, I couldn’t. It sounded to me like he was trying to butter both sides of his bread at the same time, tap dancing in the middle of the floor around everybody. Say what you mean, and mean what you say, don’t hide in the corner and try to figure out your next move, but be upfront, and you will not have to have a good memory.

Even James Dobson has expressed disappointment with this selection of candidates for president. How we ever ended up with these is beyond me. It has been said, the Democratic nominee battle will weaken the chance to take on the presumptive Republican candidate, Sen. John McCain. First of all I think they are badly mistaken, Hillary and Obama are getting a lot of show time, costly and free. No one really knows McCain’s agenda for the future, and what little we do no, is not good, so this is a gift for the two fighters Hillary and Obama. If Hillary wins, I do not think it will be much of a fight with McCain, if Obama wins, it will be a fight to the end, both are unpredictable, and I doubt could run a country. With Hillary, we get Bill free, at least he kept our heads above water.