World Political Opinions of D.L. Siluk [II]

The Chilling macabre imagination of today's world offers a growing reputation as 'Tomorrow's Master of Horror,' TV programs, here are some of my opinions on the subject [or issues as they present themselves] D.L. Siluk

Thursday, November 20, 2008

“What Happened to America in 2008?”



This is what my email is asking me: “Why did Americans pick out a Blackman for President?” “Why pick out a man for president that had prior links with a well known terrorist?” “Why pick out a president that his family is Muslim, and during his running eliminated his middle name which is Muslim, when we are at war with them?” “Why pick out a president so inexperienced, with no military service, can money and charm be the highest thing on the minds of Americans—I know they like to be entertained?” “Is it all entertainment, industry with its money, and Globalism that selects an American president now: I mean, is not that true?”

They asked me on my email “Who would you have picked for president?”

I sent this following letter out to my readers of 1.6 million, on my 27-sites,
“We had a pour selection for president this year of 2008. How we came up with the two candidates we got, is the underlining problem (which turned into a bad situation), it was the same in Peru, when they picked out Garcia for president, they the people felt they selected the best out of the worse, feeling Ollanta would bring in the terrorists. But they are coming back anyhow, and they had 105-canadates to choose, and they passed up some good qualified folks. Garcia who was president in the 1980s brought the country to financial ruin. Lessons are learned hard in Peru and it is seemingly the same lately in America.
But the question being asked is: who would I have picked, the most two qualified persons we have in the government, not the two worse, and it would most likely have been two women, Hillary (white) and Rice (black), not because of color, but because of qualifications, and background, who you hang round with is how you are judged, or so it used to be; here are two leaders, familiar with war, policy, and not afraid to step on toes. We have—sorry to say, weak men, with weak minds in the government, greedy as industry dictates what a president should and should not do. Globalism is not all it is made out to be, and neither are the WTO and all its linking groups (as we are now finding out).
But be not dismayed, if indeed we can survive this next presidency, maybe we can select a qualified person for once. We are now selecting kings who are not qualified to run wars, and economies, and human rights, and the world in general, otherwise we’d not be in such a predicament in all corners of America and the world, which should be obvious. And no matter who we would have selected out of the two potentials we had to select from, we would have ended up losers.